加拿大女子大学医院Noah M Ivers团队探讨了干预措施对心肌梗死后长期依从性和心血管事件的影响。该成果在线发表于2020年6月10日的《英国医学杂志》。
Title: Interventions supporting long term adherence and decreasing cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction (ISLAND): pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Author: Noah M Ivers, Jon-David Schwalm, Zachary Bouck, Tara McCready, Monica Taljaard, Sherry L Grace, Jennifer Cunningham, Beth Bosiak, Justin Presseau, Holly O Witteman, Neville Suskin, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Clare Atzema, R Sacha Bhatia, Madhu Natarajan, Jeremy M Grimshaw
Abstract: Objective To test a scalable health system intervention to improve long term adherence to secondary prevention treatments among patients who have had a recent myocardial infarction.
Design Three arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment.
Setting Nine cardiac centres in Ontario, Canada.
Participants 2632 patients with obstructive coronary artery disease after a myocardial infarction, identified from a centralised cardiac registry.
Interventions Participants were randomised 1:1:1 to receive usual care, five mail-outs developed through a user centred design process, or mail-outs plus phone calls. The phone calls were delivered first by an interactive automated system to screen for non-adherence to treatment. Trained lay health workers followed up as necessary. Interventions were coordinated centrally but delivered from each patient’s hospital site.
Main outcome measures Co-primary outcomes were completion of cardiac rehabilitation and adherence to recommended medication. Data were collected by blinded assessors through patient report and from administrative health databases at 12 months.
Results 2632 patients (mean age 66, 71% male) were randomised: 878 to the full intervention (mail plus phone calls), 878 to mail only, and 876 to usual care. Of the respondents, 174 (27%) of 643 in the usual care group, 200 (32%) of 628 in the mail only group, and 196 (37%) of 531 allocated to the full intervention completed cardiac rehabilitation (adjusted odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.03). In the mail plus phone group, 11.7%, 6.0%, 14.4%, 32.9%, and 35.0% reported adherence to 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 drug classes after one year, respectively, in comparison with 12.5%, 6.8%, 13.6%, 30.2%, and 36.8% in the mail only group, and 12.2%, 8.4%, 13.1%, 30.3%, and 36.1% in the usual care group, respectively (mail only v usual care, odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.19; full intervention v usual care, 0.99, 0.82 to 1.20).
Conclusions Scalable interventions delivered by mail plus phone can increase completion of cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction but not adherence to medication. More intensive interventions should be tested to improve adherence to medication and to evaluate the association between attendance at cardiac rehabilitation and adherence to medication.